Google Warns Against Relying On SEO Audit Tool
What’s the story?
Google has said: “Hey — you shouldn’t just rely on SEO audit tool scores.” These tools give you a number or grade for your website’s “health” from an SEO/technical perspective, but Google says there’s a lot more behind that number. Search Engine Journal
Why should we care?
Because:
-
Lots of businesses and people use automated tools that spit out a score like “85 / 100” and then think “Cool — I’m good.”
-
But Google says that those scores often miss the context of your website — how it’s built, what it’s used for, how its users behave. Tools may flag things that are perfectly normal for your site. Search Engine Journal
-
If you trust the number alone, you might waste time fixing things that don’t matter much — or worse: ignore things that do matter.
The three-step framework Google recommends
Google’s technical SEO expert (Martin Splitt) laid out a simple approach: Search Engine Journal+1
-
Inspect with tools and guidelines: Use automated tools to find possible issues.
-
Tailor the report: Look at the site itself — its tech stack, structure, audiences — and group issues accordingly.
-
Prioritise & act: Decide what fixes will have big impact (crawl, index, user experience) vs small impact. Then do them.
Some deeper insights
-
A high number of “404 – Not Found” errors may not be a problem if you’ve recently removed content. That’s expected. But a sudden spike without reason? That’s worth investigating. Search Engine Journal
-
Tools might flag something simply because “the rule says so”, but for your specific site, that “rule” may not apply or may have much lower priority. Example: an international site needs special “hreflang” tags; a local-small site may not. Search Engine Journal
-
The key message: Context over scores. The number (90/100) is nice, but what really matters is how your site works in the real world. Google emphasises human judgement + site-specific knowledge, not blind tool obedience. Search Engine Journal
Why this matters for you (and your clients)
Since you’re working on web design + SEO (and also automations, funnels etc) — here’s how to use this insight:
-
Don’t sell a “we’ll get your score to 95%” as your main promise. Instead: “We’ll audit what matters for your business, fix what blocks performance, and focus on users + search engines.”
-
When you run audits (for your own site or clients): include a tool-report but also a custom assessment: How is the site built? What traffic/behaviour does it have? What is the business goal?
-
Use this as a differentiator: Many agencies just hand over tool reports. You bring in context + impact. That aligns well with your USP of “practical execution + ready-to-use strategies”.
-
If you’re offering audit services in that ₹1,000-₹10,000 range, emphasise value: yes audits, yes fixes, but also what it means for my business, what’s the impact — not just “your score is low”.
In simple terms (for everyone, including kids)
Imagine you have a toy car. Someone gives it a score of 80 out of 100 because the wheels roll, the doors open, the paint is fine. But you actually use the car on a bumpy road, and the engine stalls sometimes, and the lights flicker. The tool just checked some boxes — didn’t see the real-world road you use it on.
Similarly, an SEO audit tool gives you a number. But CSS quirks, hosting setup, unusual content types, removal of older pages — all these contextual things matter for your “road performance”. The number doesn’t always tell the whole story.
Key takeaways
-
✅ Audit tools = good start, not final answer.
-
✅ Always understand your website’s technology & business context.
-
✅ Prioritise what impacts crawling/indexing & user experience.
-
✅ Don’t fix everything at once — fix what matters first.
-
✅ Use this insight to show your clients: “We’re not just chasing numbers; we’re solving real problems.

Comments
Post a Comment